Home > Childhood Development > Brain Gym

Brain Gym

By: Miriam Vered - Updated: 16 Sep 2013 | comments*Discuss
Brain Gym

Is it a simple program that brings about rapid and dramatic improvements in learning abilities or a vast empire of pseudoscience that involves lying to children?

The supporters (mainly practitioners and coaches of brain gym) claim that it hugely enhances concentration, memory, reading, writing, organising, listening, physical co-ordination and more! They also propose numerous detailed explanations of why.The critics, (mainly doctors, neuroscientists and psychologists) say that it's an expensive way of getting some very obvious, sensible bits of advice. Even worse, they say that the scientific basis is deeply flawed and that the program shamelessly promotes basic misunderstandings of science in the classroom.

What is Brain Gym?

It all started with a Californian who worked with disabled children in the late 1960s. His name was Paul Dennison, and he started by looking at a subject called kinesiology, where attempts are made to relate body movement to brain function. Over the course of many years, he and his wife developed and marketed a program called educational kinesiology, which they and their followers have since applied to a wide variety of subjects including learning disabled children, children with ADHD, athletes, Alzheimer's patients and insurance salesmen. Their basic claim is that certain body movements, repeated regularly, along with drinking a lot of water, can improve learning and a host of other cognitive functions, in all these groups of people and in fact, in pretty much everyone.

The brain gym program that is now used in hundreds of UK state schools and promoted in many government websites is billed as an introductory level program in Educational Kinesiology. In these schools, teachers undergo training courses by brain gym experts then introduce the exercises as regular breaks of a few minutes in the course of their classes. The exercises include things like "brain buttons", where you press your thumb and forefingers over a certain point in your upper ribcage, and "the energiser" which involves complicated back and forth movements of the head.Enthusiasts say that the children enjoy it and seem to learn better than before.

The brain gym practitioners say that there's lots of evidence that it works. They also propose lots of reasons why – and that's what gets the scientists hopping mad.

What's Wrong with it?

How much harm can it do children to drink water and wiggle their fingers about in the middle of a lesson? It's all pretty harmless isn't it?The doctors and neuroscientists who object to brain gym disagree.Even the most vehement critics don't think that there's anything actually wrong with the exercises themselves and it's hard to find fault with the idea of encouraging children to drink water. Most would agree that a short break can be refreshing and improve performance.

The problems begin with the quasi-scientific basis of the whole program. First of all, claims are made that the effects are "scientifically proven". But it turns out that the "evidence" is all self published – in the journal that belongs to the brain gym organisation itself. Any reputable scientist knows that studies are only taken seriously if they're published in independent, peer reviewed journals. It's critical that the reviewers and the publishers should have no stake, financial or otherwise, in the results. That's the only way to keep things objective and unbiased. That clearly hasn't happened here.

The only studies to actually appear in any peer reviewed journals suggest that any intra class exercise program is equally effective at slightly improving some measures of performance. There's just not a shred of objective evidence that brain gym itself does anything special. But of course, the brain gym practitioners have a huge financial motive to suggest otherwise.

Then there's the more sinister side of it all, that the critics of dodgy science are up in arms about. To put it plainly, the brain gym gurus encourage teachers to feed children a pack of lies about science.

  • "Hold the water in your mouth before you swallow, so that your brain will absorb it more directly". Any GCSE biology student could probably tell you that that's complete rubbish.

  • There's a complete misunderstanding of things like how oxygen gets into and around the body – they think that a funny yawn gives "increased oxidation for efficient relaxed functioning." (They probably mean oxygenation. Oxidation means rusting and anyway you don't need to yawn to get oxygen into your blood. Breathing is usually quite sufficient.)

  • They get the basics of human anatomy wrong, like the position of the carotid arteries in the "brain button" exercise.

  • They claim that processed foods contain no water. That's just plain wrong.

The list goes on and on. Should we laugh or cry? The "science" behind the whole thing is obviously PR spin and marketing, and has clearly been very successful in persuading some key people to implement the program so widely. Well, on an individual level, that's what advertising in a free society is all about. The problem comes when you try to confuse a generation of children. When teachers tell them obvious falsehoods about how their bodies work then inform them that 9 is the square root of 81, or that Paris is the capital of France, how can they know what to believe?

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

(never shown)
(never shown)
(never shown)
(never shown)
Enter word:
Latest Comments
  • Aawwmmm
    Re: Savant Syndrome
    That's so cool I would be more impressed if you told me you spoke with other individuals while you were sleeping or even comprehend that there are…
    20 August 2017
  • Alex2017
    Re: Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
    Hi, for many years now I am suffering severe ocd. I cannot drive car anymore, and also I get some new symptoms. Things I struggle…
    24 April 2017
  • Alex
    Re: How Does Language Acquisition Happen?
    This is a very one-sided article and only takes a nativist view into account, can be misleading for someone who has no…
    21 January 2017
  • Soulless
    Re: Savant Syndrome
    I've been able to dream the future since I was a child. Others have always told me it's just deja vu or they'll congratulate me on having a grand…
    23 August 2016
  • bj17
    Re: Literacy and Your Brain
    Does anyone have the source for more information on the changes in the brain as guerrillas learn to read?
    11 February 2016
  • pampam
    Re: How to Get Great Exam Results Using Exam Technique
    pls can some one tell me the clues to pass my exam and be the first am tired of 7th position
    29 January 2016
  • Abraham
    Re: Is Intelligence Inherited
    Peter, your comment is a sign of being not intelligent. Otherwise by that logic we'd all have black skin...Two words, GENETIC…
    3 December 2015
  • freckles
    Re: How Long Do Young Children Take to Process Information?
    I had brain trauma as a child from the age of ten yrs oldafter falling from a swing park shute…
    29 November 2015
  • BrainSkills
    Re: How to Develop Empathy Skills
    Andrea - Your Question:Hello, my partner doesn't understand what empathy means, and he doesn't know how to explain his feelings…
    27 November 2015
  • Andrea
    Re: How to Develop Empathy Skills
    Hello, my partner doesn't understand what empathy means, and he doesn't know how to explain his feelings either. I've tried to…
    25 November 2015
Further Reading...
Our Most Popular...
Add to my Yahoo!
Add to Google
Stumble this
Add to Twitter
Add To Facebook
RSS feed
You should seek independent professional advice before acting upon any information on the BrainSkills website. Please read our Disclaimer.